Compiled by MJ Bradley & Associates
5/11/2006
A number of stakeholders released statements on the Clean Air Planning Act of 2006. Here is some of
what these groups had to say:
"Senators Carper, Chafee, Alexander and Gregg’s Clean Air Planning Act would take a major step
forward in obtaining the additional air pollution reductions that we need from power plants across
the United States. It would result in broad regional reductions in particle pollution and
smog. But unlike the Clear Skies legislation pending in Congress, this bill will not weaken
provisions in the existing Clean Air Act needed to control emissions from individual power plants
that contribute to local air pollution problems. We applaud the senators’ efforts."
John L. Kirkwood
President and CEO
American Lung Association
Download the complete
American Lung Association Press Release
"The Clean Air Planning Act would reduce emissions of greenhouse gases in the electric utility
sector, an important first step to preventing the most damaging consequences of climate change.
The Clean Air Planning Act reduces the cost of carbon management by allowing American farmers to
play a role in providing low cost carbon offsets.  The adverse impacts of global warming are all
around us; hardly a week passes without more scientific evidence demonstrating that we need to
act now."
Fred Krupp
President
Environmental Defense
Download the complete
Environmental Defense Press Release
"A major advantage of the Clean Air Planning Act over the competing approaches is that it achieves
environmental progress without scrapping existing protections. The Clean Air Planning Act
builds on the strengths of the Clean Air Act, a law that has enjoyed wide bi-partisan support for
more than 30 years."
-Thomas C. Kiernan
President
National Parks Conservation Association
Download the complete
National Parks Conservation Association Press Release
"If enacted, the Clean Air Planning Act of 2006 would greatly reduce many of the largest power
plant-related conventional air pollution problems by 2015. Its strengthened emissions reductions
requirements for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and mercury are some of the most protective
measures proposed in recent years. For one, your new per-unit, no-trading mercury pollution
reduction requirement addresses the critical problem of local contamination."
Philip Clapp
President
National Environmental Trust
Download the complete
National Environmental Trust Press Release
Back to the Clean Energy Group News Room.